Posts Tagged ‘mobile phones’

Cavalcade of Risk & other news from the blogosphere

Wednesday, June 1st, 2011

Happy birthday, Cavalcade of Risk! – Russell Chatswood hosts the Fifth Anniversary Edition of Cavalcade of Risk – check it out. Russell is a New Zealander and among the Cavalcade’s posts is an update on the Christchurch earthquake claims from a report issued by New Zealand’s Investment Savings and Insurance Association (ISI).
New to our blogrollDePaolo’s Work Comp Blog – by industry veteran Dave DePaolo, founder and CEO of WorkCompCentral.
When the bears win – In a post at Comp Time today, Roberto Ceniceros reports on a Utah appeals court ruling that upheld benefits for a light-duty employee who was fired for sending porno to colleagues via email. In citing the ruling, Ceniceros quotes The Stranger in the The Big Lebowski who said, “Sometimes you eat the bear, and sometimes, well, he eats you.” That is our nomination for our motto of the week.
Zombie style at the CDC – Have trouble getting your message heard by employers and employees? Maybe you need a new, attention-getting spin. Consumer Insurance Blog posts about how the CDC highlighted the importance of disaster and emergency planning by repackaging it as Preparedness 101: Zombie Apocalypse. With this packaging, they went from a few thousand page views for normal posts to more than 1.2 million over the course a few days.
Cell phones & brain cancer – In reaction to the recent World Health Organization warnings about cancer and cell phones, Merril Goozner posts about the role that conflicted science plays. Also see Gary Schwitzer’s post: News release precedes release of evidence on new cell phone/brain cancer warning.
ADA Amendments Act – The final regulations issued by the EEOC to implement the ADA Amendments Act of 2008 became effective on May 24. The new regulations feature 9 “Rules of Construction” to help employers determine whether an impairment substantially limits a major life activity. HR Daily Advisor offers a pair of posts to help employers plan for the changes: ADAAA Effective Tomorrow–Ready for Its 9 Rules of Construction? and ADAAA Effective Today–Steps Employers Should Take.
Cool tool – Objects falling from a height are a serious safety hazard – that’s why anyone working at a height should secure their tools. Tethers are a good way to do this. Hammerhead Industries offers a one page reference sheet: Tool Tether Guide (PDF)
Bus safety – At Risk Management Monitor, Jared Wade brings the news of another fatal bus crash which claimed the lives of 4 and injured more than 50. Driver fatigue is cited as the cause of the crash. Wade cites this as another instance highlighting the industry’s lack of oversight, and posts about other recent coverage on bus safety. He notes that there have been two stalled-in-Congress bills that have attempted to impose greater regulations: the Motor Coach Enhanced Safety Act and the Bus Uniform Standards and Enhanced Safety (BUSES) Act.
OSHA fines – from The Safety Blog, the Top 10 fines for construction companies. “In total in the 2010 fiscal year OSHA inspected 16,473 small construction companies and handed out 50,630 citations. These citations cost employers more than $46 million or an average of about $900 a citation.”

Texting can be lethal

Tuesday, October 14th, 2008

With the recent focus on the economic meltdown and the pending election, you might have missed the story about the likely cause of the horrific California train crash that killed 25 people last month and injured 135 others. Almost immediately, authorities knew that the accident was the result of human error – the driver had failed to stop at a stop sign. But what didn’t surface until later is that the driver was text messaging just seconds before the crash:

“Robert Sanchez, the driver of a Los Angeles Metrolink commuter train that crashed head-on with a freight locomotive, may have been text messaging seconds before the fatal crash, according to subpoenaed reports from Verizon Wireless. Records show the driver had received a text at 4:21.03 p.m. and sent a text at 4:22.01 p.m. The two trains crashed seconds later at 4:22.23 p.m.
Records also showed that during his time operating the train, the engineer received seven text messages and sent five. Earlier in the day, during a two-hour morning shift, the engineer’s cell phone received 21 text messages and sent 24 text messages.”

The driver’s texting was in violation of the National Transportation Safety Board’s policy banning all use of phones while operating a train. As any employer knows, having a policy and enforcing it can be two separate matters, in this case with tragic results.
In most states, texting while driving is still a legal practice. While several states are looking at potential laws to ban the practice, only a handful of states currently have such laws on the books – the state of California and the city of Chicago have recently both banned the practice. A recent survey of 1500 drivers by Nationwide Insurance revealed that about 20% of drivers are texting while behind the wheel – and that number may reach as high as 66% when isolating drivers aged 18 to 24.
Regardless of state law, employers should enact safety policies that encompass mobile devices. Tom Starner deals with safety and other issues related to emerging technology in Human Resource Executive Online article Calling for Enforcement. And if the human cost alone isn’t enough to catch an employer’s attention, Starner cites a number of litigated cases with multi-million dollar settlements related to fatalities caused by employees who were using mobile devices. He quotes Portland, Ore. attorney Nancy M. Cooper:

“As those latest examples show, it’s becoming increasingly important for employers to implement effective cell-phone-use policies, both to limit liability and improve safety,” Cooper says. “It doesn’t matter if a call is being made during regular office hours or not; what matters is that the call [or text messaging] is work related. Employers may be found liable for any damages caused by an employee acting within the scope of his or her employment.”

Motor vehicle related workplace injuries are among the most common, and are also one of the leading causes of workplace death. We’ve talked about he need for diligent risk management policies and procedures for employees who drive – it’s a good time for employers to update policies to specifically address text messaging.

“Crackberry” Addicts: One More Email for the Road…

Monday, October 2nd, 2006

It’s only Monday, so it might be too early in the week for this. But the Insider is committed to keeping our readers informed on the latest developments in risk and human resource management. Today, we confront the physical, emotional and legal time bomb of BlackBerry addiction.
We first tracked the health implications of using tiny keyboards in our “BlackBerry Thumb” posting in February of last year. Well, repetitive motion is certainly a potential problem, but that may prove to be the least of the worries for employers who hand out these devices. We now find that the seductive technology embodied in PDAs is leading workers into hospitals, mental health facilities and courtrooms.”Crackberry” devices are addictive. Workers find themselves unable to put the little contraptions down. By connecting workers 24/7 to their jobs, employers suddenly find themselves on the hook for unanticipated liabilities.
The Independent out of Great Britain tells us of Nada Kakabadse (now that’s a splendid name!), a professor at England’s Northampton Business School. The good professor warns British employers that they could face multi-million-pound legal actions from BlackBerry-addicted staff on a similar scale as class law-suits taken against tobacco companies. That’s a pretty big scale, indeed! Research by the University of Northampton has revealed that one-third of BlackBerry users showed signs of addictive behaviour similar to an alcoholic being unable to pass a pub without a drink. “Just one more email for the road…”
Textbook symptoms
The report found that some BlackBerry users displayed textbook addictive symptoms – denial, withdrawal and antisocial behaviour – and that time with their families was being taken up with BlackBerry-checking, even at the dinner table.
As a result, Professor Kakabadse notes that employers are being sued for failing in their duty of care to staff and in following health and safety guidelines. In one case in the US, a female business consultant claimed that her marriage fell apart because she was constantly checking messages. She ended up losing custody of her children and sued her employer for damages. [Note to our lawyer readers: I have no citations for this and the subsequent cases.]
Written Policies
“Enlightened companies that issue BlackBerrys as standard like pen and paper should also have policies on how to use them, so that people can use technology in a way that doesn’t have an addictive side,” said Professor Kakabadse. So perhaps your written policy should require that the device be turned off during dinner, during any interactions with spouse and children, during love making for sure and at bedtime. [Just how such a policy would be enforced is beyond the scope of this posting.] One Chicago hotel has even offered to lock up your Blackberry, so you can enjoy your stay unencumbered and unconnected.
The Independent article cites another recent case, where a woman sued after putting cleaning fluid on her baby’s nappy instead of baby oil because she was distracted by her BlackBerry. [We sympathize with this poor working mom for making such a common mistake in the nursery. No question, it’s her employer’s fault.]
One study reveals that nine out of every 10 users have a compulsive need to check for messages and that nearly half experience long-term negative consequences associated with carrying a BlackBerry. A survey of business workers by researchers at the Sloan School of Management at Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the US found that employees were constantly tired because they were waking up in the middle of the night to check or send messages. One interviewee likened the sense of potential gain from staying in touch with work to “pulling the lever of a slot machine”.
24/7 = Always at Work
A professor at Rutgers’s School of Business, Gayle Porter, predicts in a soon-to-be-published study that disgruntled workers who feel they are unable to turn off their personal digital assistants and mobile telephones will begin suing their employers for their technology addictions — and that such lawsuits could potentially cost corporate America hundreds of millions of dollars.
“If companies develop a culture in which people are expected to be available 24 hours a day, then they should be prepared for the physical and psychological consequences,” Mrs. Porter said. “Addicts exhibit extreme behavior and have no control over themselves. So a corporation handing someone a BlackBerry on his first day of work could be seen as enabling, even accelerating, a serious addiction to technology.”
Be Forewarned
The trends are clear, the dangers incontrovertible. Uncontrolled use of Blackberry-type devices can lead to physical, mental and social debilitation. Someone is bound to announce the development of a new 12 step program for Crackberry addicts. The road to recovery will begin with the assertion that “I am an addict.” Meanwhile, employers should develop comprehensive written warnings to accompany the provision of any PDAs. These guidelines should set clear parameters for appropriate Blackberry use. With half the marriages in this country already ending in divorce, employers need to avoid any possible inference that work – and work-provided equipment – is a significant cause of marital discord. In the ever-expanding definition of risk management, this is one area where increased vigilance – and a few disclaimers – are definitely in order.