Posts Tagged ‘Medicare’

Medicare Set-Aside as Marital Asset?

Monday, March 12th, 2012

Here is a truly bizarre case from Illinois that will likely send our many attorney readers scrambling for their statute books.
Christopher Washkowiak worked as a pipefitter. He suffered a serious work-related injury in 2009. The following year, his marriage broke up (dissolved as of August) and he settled his workers comp case in December. The settlement totalled $365K, plus a Medicare Set Aside (MSA) for an additional $70K. Washkowiak’s wife, Rosana, was entitled to 17.5% of the marital assets. She claimed not just 17.5% of the $365K lump sum settlement, but the same percentage of the MSA.
The initial trial court and the Illinois Appellate Court, 3rd District, ruled that Rosana was entitled to the money. Here is the Appeals Court ruling:

Unless there is something about an MSA that removes the MSA funds from the definition of “net proceeds,” the funds fall squarely within the dissolution decrees’s definition of “net proceeds” (paragraph 10).

The court goes on to say that “there is no question that the money is his [Christopher”s] and further that “it is not Medicare’s or [the employer’s] money” (paragraph 15).
Finally, the ruling goes on to state that “if he incurs no such [medical] bills, he gets the money back” (paragraph 17).
It is worth noting that Rosana apparently does not have to wait to see if the funds are needed for future medical expenses. The court has foreshortened this process to the point where she gets the money now, as part of the divorce settlement.
Attention All Attorneys!
There are a number of parties who will be alarmed by this ruling:
The Federal Government: Medicare will surely object to the expenditure of MSA funds for non-medical purposes, diluting what is available for future expenses (and thereby defeating the purpose of the MSA).
Insurers and self-insureds: will be shocked to see funds set aside for future medical expenses being used for other purposes; this will inevitably lead to further inflation of future MSAs. (Indeed, Medicare might hesitate to sign off on any settlement prior to determining the relative strength of the marriage – and we all know how much stress disability puts on a marriage…Yikes!)
What if this divorce entailed the conventional 50/50 division of assets? Half the money in the MSA could be spent before the account even got started.
I have never heard MSAs referred to as claimant assets. In my limited understanding, the amount awarded to the claimant is separate and distinct from the MSA. Funds in an MSA can be used only to pay medical bills. In addition, I have never heard of a situation where unspent MSA funds reverted directly to claimants; they would likely revert to the insurer or the self-insured, whoever set aside the money. (If any of our attorney readers have any knowledge to the contrary, please let us know!)
MSAs carry a lot of baggage already: the MSA process slows down settlements while stakeholders wait for federal bureaucrats to check the numbers; MSAs seriously inflate the current cost of settlements, complicating an already complicated process. If this ruling in Illinois is upheld, if MSAs are truly marital assets, then, as the saying goes, “we ain’t seen nothing yet.”

Health Wonk Review’s Memorial Day Edition

Thursday, May 26th, 2011

Chris Fleming hosts a substantive Memorial Day issue of Health Wonk Review at Health Affairs Blog – there are a lot of good submissions on a variety of topics, from Medicare and the Affordable Care Act to quality and healthcare IT.
If you have an interest in health care – and with medical costs comprising a bigger and bigger portion of the claims dollar every year, you probably do – Health Affairs Blog is a good candidate for your regular reading list. The Blog is an offshoot of the publication of the same name, a peer-reviewed health policy journal that has held a premier place in the health policy arena for the last 30 years. The blog is a welcome adjunct to the journal. According to their “About” page: “The Blog features posts from noted health policy experts on both sides of the political aisle as well as regular Health Affairs contributors and staff. Recent bloggers have included Former Bush HHS Secretary Tommy Thompson, economists Uwe Reinhardt and Gail Wilensky, California HealthCare Foundation President and CEO Mark Smith, and Congressman James Cooper (D-TN).”

Thanksgiving Cavalcade Of Risk, social media, pigeon poop & more

Wednesday, November 17th, 2010

For your biweekly risk roundup, check out the Thanksgiving Cavalcade Of Risk posted by Louise at Colorado Health Insurance Insider. Louise always does a great job curating the carnivals.
Is claim frequency on the upswing? – At Comp Time, Roberto Ceniceros says that claims data gathered by Liberty Mutual Group shows frequency trending up.
Another extension for Medicare Secondary Payer requirementsNational Underwriter reports that The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has agreed to delay certain mandatory reporting requirements for workers’ compensation cases under the Medicare Secondary Payer law until January 2012. These requirements had previously been extended to January 2011. The exemption is for liability claims that do not involve on-going medical responsibility, according to officials at the American Insurance Association.
Wheelchair checklist – at Complex Care Blog, Zack Craft offers checklist for wheelchair accessibility in the home for adjusters, nurse case managers and others who are involved in managing the care of injured workers. It’s intended to be used as a starting point for a review at the onset of a claim to to ensure the claimant’s needs are met and to minimize costs and legal issues over the life of the claim.
10 years of preventing needlestick injuries – Over at The Pump Handle, Liz Borkowski informs us that it is the 10th anniversary of the Needlestick Safety and Prevention Act. Her post includes links to current standards as well as an update of progress since the act’s passage.
Collision course At Today’s Workplace, Roger Bybee has posted a great article on an issue that is heating up: NFL Collision: Management Control vs. Player Safety. He tackles the issue of chronic brain injuries vs an industry with a culture that has touted its violent collisions as a feature. One interesting aspect that Bybee points out is that as advanced helmets got harder, the collisions became more dangerous, not less.
Cool tool of the week – If you’ve been frustrated that you can never access American Medical Association studies, research, and news directly, there’s some good news. Last week, the AMA announced it will open its 10 years of American Medical News archives to the general public. They say: “It represents a rich resource on issues confronting physicians and trends in medicine. Content includes in-depth reporting on the business and regulatory sides of health care, practice management and hot issues in public health and patient care.”
Pigeon poop safety – We admit that pigeon poop is a safety hazard we have never given much thought to, but that doesn’t mean it’s not an important issue. Safety Daily Advisor recommends proper personal protective equipment to protect workers from exposure to serious conditions, including histoplasmosis and cryptococcosis.
Florida’s Sinkhole Belt – OK, it’s not comp-related – at least not so far, but Emily Holbrook of Risk Management Monitor has a fascinating post on how Florida sinkhole claims are skyrocketing. “According to a new state report, for the years 2006 through 2010, sinkhole claims have cost Florida property insurers $1.4 billion — a number that could reach $2 billion by the end of this year.” She links to the state report and a video clip that offer more info about this problem which is one of the state’s major premium cost drivers. Yikes. (We confess that we have been inordinately fascinated with sinkholes since seeing reports of this Guatemalan monster last spring.)
Tweet this – Claire Wilkinson of III’s Insurance Industry Blog posts about a recent research report that notes a big uptick in Fortune-500 insurers who are using Twitter – up from 13 in 2009 to 20 in 2010. That’s either a sign that Twitter is here to stay or that it has jumped the shark, you be the judge. If you aren’t on Twitter yet, what are you waiting for? The following video is more than a year old so already outdated, but it is elucidating about the speed of change in the way we are communicating.

Medicare and Physician Pay: Jim Bunning’s Bean Ball

Wednesday, March 3rd, 2010

There are four things that are memorable about Jim Bunning’s professional baseball career: First, tossing a perfect game for the Philadelphia Phillies against Trace Stallard and the New York Mets on the afternoon of 21 June 1964, lowering his ERA to 2.07 in the process (Phillies: 6 runs, 8 hits and no errors; Mets: Zip, Nada and Zilch); second, finishing second in the Cy Young voting in 1967 (Mike McCormick of the Giants won with 18 first place votes; Bunning got one, but, hey, it was good enough for the silver medal); third, from 1955 to 1963 while pitching for the Tigers, striking out Ted Williams more than any other pitcher Williams faced (and, as Jim Bouton’s Memoir, Ball Four, tells it, Teddy Ballgame did not like it one bit); and fourth, entering the Hall of Fame compliments of the Veterans Committee in 1996.
About this time in Washington, DC, there are many Republican Senators, baseball fans all, who are wishing that the 6’3″, 190 pound righthander had called it quits right there and retired to the backwoods of Kentucky. But, of course, he didn’t. He had to go ruining it all by running for and winning a Senate seat from the blue grass state in 1998; and then he did it again in 2004! The political version of the Peter Principle.
Republicans politely call him “cantankerous” – at least that’s what they say in public. Behind the scenes, they’re not so nice about it. Senator Bunning marches to his own drummer, and always has.
One Pitch, Three Strikes
He’s retiring this year, but not before throwing one more hard-breaking slider (his best pitch back in the day). On Monday he managed something he never could in the Big Leagues – he threw three strikes with one pitch. By preventing a vote on an emergency spending bill, Senator Bunning: first, at least temporarily, killed an extension of unemployment and COBRA subsidy benefits for more than a million long-term unemployed Americans; second, shot down a short-term extension of the Highway Trust Fund, which is a federal fund set up to pay for transportation projects nationwide, after which Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said that up to 2,000 employees at the Transportation Department will be furloughed without pay as a result; and third, insured that Medicare would immediately reduce fees to physicians by 21.3% via the Medicare Sustainable Growth Rate Factor (SGR). Wow, a “threefor!”
Strike 3 is what concerns us here. We’ve written often about the steep and steadily rising costs of Medicare, and now along comes Senator Bunning saying we have to lower costs and let’s do it on the backs of hard-working primary care physicians. He certainly has a point that we need to lower Medicare costs, although he expressed it in a wild pitch sort of way. Here’s a chart from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) that shows what will happen to Medicare costs in the future if nothing changes. The vertical axis is percentage of GDP:
medicare-in-the-future.jpg
And here’s a summary from a Congressional Budget Office (CBO) Issue Brief on the Medicare Sustainable Growth Rate Mechanism (PDF). It’s from September, 2006, but is still appropriate: The Supplemental Medical Insurance program (Part B of Medicare), which will cost about $158 billion in 2006, pays for physicians’ services, outpatient hospital services, durable medical equipment, physical therapy, and certain other outpatient services. About 38 percent of those expenditures are payments for services provided by physicians, which are based on a schedule of fees that specifies the amount to be paid for each type of service. Most of Medicare’s payment rates are simply adjusted each year for inflation–but not those for physicians’ services (emphasis added). Those rates are governed by a complex formula — the Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) mechanism.
The SGR is pegged against a target originally established in the 1997 Deficit Reduction Act. Its aim is to hold down Medicare costs. It’s calculated every year, and every year since 2004 this complex and nearly Byzantine calculation has called for an annual reduction of physician reimbursement rates by an average of 3% to 4%.
Nonetheless, every year since 2004 Congress, yielding to the medical lobby, has voted to override it by delaying the triggering of it. The trouble is, the law is cumulative. So, what Congress has done in a typically heroic display of moral courage, is to dig itself into an ever-deepening hole by not facing up to yet another looming catastrophe. Sound familiar?
Docs Rush the Mound
The AMA is nearly apoplectic about the SGR and the prospect of Senator Bunning causing it to be finally triggered. Monday, the organization was out in force in DC making its views known. The current President, Dr. James Rohack, went on Bloomberg and, later, CNN with Larry King. President-Elect Dr. Cecil Wilson even did an hour on Washington Journal C-Span answering questions from Democrats, Republicans and Independents, and, generally making his case.
And his case was that for a while now, physicians have been abandoning the Medicare ship, because, even though their Medicare fees have remained steady due to the congressional overrides, they claim they’re losing money with Medicare patients because their costs have been inexorably rising. Moreover, it’s no secret that there is an ever-increasing shortage of primary care physicians, and CMS reports that, while 92% of primary care physicians participate in Medicare, only 73% are accepting new patients. If nothing changes, that will surely drop precipitously.
Case in point – the Mayo Clinic, President Obama’s iconic national model of high-quality health care efficiency, lost $840 million on Medicare in 2008, and, as of January 1, 2010, stopped seeing Medicare patients at its Glendale, AZ, clinic. The Mayo claims Medicare covers only 50% of its costs every time it sees a Medicare Patient.
So, we’re left with another one of those rock and hard place things. Medicare could bankrupt the nation, but physicians don’t get paid enough from it.
Yesterday, Congress stole second base on Bunning by extending unemployment and COBRA benefits for another month and by delaying the 21.3% Medicare physician pay cut until the end of March, at which time we’ll probably have to go through this whole thing all over again. (Yogi Berra’s “déjà vu?)
Perhaps Senator Bunning’s out of left field move will actually cause Congress to do something it has thus far been absolutely incapable of doing regarding our nation’s health care. That is, fix it.
Right. And tomorrow 78 year old Jim Bunning will quit the Senate and to great expectations accept a $100 million free-agent contract to rejoin the Phillies as their Pitching Ace.

Cavalcade of Risk and News You Can Use

Wednesday, February 24th, 2010

New Cavalcade of Risk – David Williams of Health Business Blog is this week’s host of Cavalcade of Risk. He offers a concise array of postings, including one method of improving immune response that you absolutely do not want to miss. While stopping by, check out his other posts – he always has the scoop on interesting new issues and trends in healthcare. Also, follow his Twitter feed.
Healthcare reform – The latest Kaiser Tracking Poll on attitudes to healthcare reform shows that while Americans are evenly split on health care reform legislation (43% for; 43% against), but agree on certain provisions. The poll also shows that if Congress decides to stop working on healthcare, 58 percent of Americans say they will be either disappointed or angry, with 38% saying they will feel happy or relieved.
There is support for several key provisions of reform that cuts across all political persuasions. Percent saying that it is extremely or very important:
76% – reforming the way health insurance works
72% providing tax credits to small businesses
71% Creating a health insurance exchange / marketplace
71% Helping to close the Medicare doughnut hole
70% Expanding high risk insurance pools
68% Providing financial help for low / middle income
Property-casualty trends – At the Insurance Information Institute’s Blog, Claire Wilkinson posts that the U.S. property-casualty rating trends are stable. She reports on the A.M. Best 2009 Rating Trend Review, which says that although the industry’s results are likely to be pressured in 2010, rating actions are not expected to move profoundly in one direction and the number of upgrades/positive outlooks and downgrades/negative outlooks will be fairly balanced over the next year.
California agriculture – According to a study conducted by the California Workers’ Compensation Institute, the state’s agriculture industry accounted for 5.5 percent of all injury claims and 5.9 percent of all workers’ compensation benefit payments over an eight-year study period. The three most common injury categories for these workers were medical back problems without spinal cord involvement; minor wounds and injuries to the skin; and shoulder, arm, knee and lower leg sprains.
Colorado Fraud surveillance – Pending legislation in Colorado would put new restrictions on insurers and employers use of surveillance of employees with workers comp claims. Before surveillance can be conducted, the insurer or employer must have a reasonable basis to suspect fraud, and employees would have the right to a hearing to learn why they are being investigated. Critics of the law say that, if passed, it would be the nation’s most restrictive surveillance law related to workers comp. At Comp Time, Roberto Ceniceros examines the issue of the dollar value of surveillance.
Medicare Second Payer deadline – The Centers for Medicare/Medicaid Services (CMS) advises that the deadline for non-group health mandatory reporting for secondary payer has been delayed from April 1, 2010 to January 1, 2011. “Medicare Secondary Payer reporting requirements are intended to ensure that Medicare remains the secondary payer when a Medicare beneficiary has medical expenses that should be paid primarily by a liability, no-fault or workers compensation plan.”
Health & Safety – Most employers know that good health & safety resources are avaiable from OSHA and the CDC. Don’t forget out neighbor to the north. The Canadian Center for Occupational Health and Safety has a wealth of information also. A few recent finds:
Vibration Exposure
Tips on handling negative interactions at work
Substitution of Chemicals: Considerations for Selection
Excavations: A guide to safe work practices – a 6 part video

The Medicare Secondary Payer Statute: In Search of Ariadne’s Thread

Monday, February 8th, 2010

In Greek mythology, Daedalus built the Labyrinth for King Minos of Knossos to contain the awful half bull/half man Minotaur. Theseus eventually killed the Minotaur, but only found his way out of the Labyrinth because Ariadne had given him a magic thread to mark his way in and out of the maze. I’m beginning to think that American health care makes the Labyrinth look like an easy walk across Boston Common on a sunny day. And, so far at least, no one seems to have found the magic thread.
Workers’ compensation medical care is now getting whipsawed by two powerful and unstoppable forces: the Medicare Secondary Payer Statute (MSP) and the inexorable aging of the baby boomer generation.
We’ve written about these two looming catastrophes in the past. Seventy-eight million baby boomers are hard to ignore, and the MSP issue is starting to remind me of the 1958 horror movie, The Blob , wherein a gelatinous creature grew gargantuan by eating everything in its path. Two things have already occurred in the new year that bode well for continued growth of the MSP Blob.
The insurance industry goes a-begging
Last week the American Insurance Association, the National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies and the Self-Insurance Institute of America wrote to the Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sibelius asking her to delay the 1 April 2010 implementation of MSP mandatory reporting requirements. You can find the reporting requirements here.
The new regs lay a heavy burden on the comp insurance industry, referred to in the regs as Responsible Reporting Entities (RREs). (Such unfortunate acronyms bring me back, alas, to my days in the military.) RREs must report to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) any workers’ compensation claims that involve ongoing medical payments, with the exception of most medical only claims. In their letter, the organizations list five reasons they believe an implementation delay is necessary. The first items are all about process: security protection, a lack of guidance from the CMS and an insufficient period for testing the proposed reporting procedures. The fifth reason, which is really the first reason, is the economic big stick which, when deadlines are missed, will slap fines of up to $1,000 per day per claim upside the heads of RREs. Ouch!
There’s a lot more to it, and we’ll be writing more about it in the coming months, but for now it’s enough to know that the insurance industry is on its collective knees asking for a delay in the implementation of reporting requirements that have already been delayed and extended once.
Inedible Maryland Crabcake?
The second thing affecting MSP that happened in the new year may or may not turn out to be a big deal. On 4 January 2010, the Maryland Workers’ Compensation Commission issued emergency regulations that require CMS approval for all workers’ compensation settlements, not just the ones that meet the review thresholds in the CMS User Guide, version 2.0. The commission is requiring CMS review of virtually every claim up for settlement.
The new procedures require that every settlement pass through CMS before the Commission will approve it. Here is an excerpt from Maryland’s emergency regulations:

A settlement that falls within the Medicare thresholds must be approved by CMS before it will be approved by the Commission.

A settlement the falls outside the Medicare thresholds may be approved by the Commission provided that the settlement agreement:

1. Contains a statement confirming that the interests of Medicare have been considered in reaching the settlement; and

2. Identifies the amount of the proposed settlement:

a. Apportioned to future medical expenses;or

b. Set-aside for future medical expenses through a formal set-aside allocation

3. The apportionment of the amount of the settlement associated with future medical expenses shall be supported by medical evidence such as a medical opinion or evaluation.

While it remains to be seen if the Commission’s action will significantly delay settlements or increase costs in Maryland, it’s reasonable to assume that it will. As any workers’ compensation professional knows, the longer a claim stays open, the more it costs. As a result, the Maryland approach to Medicare set asides is not a good candidate for replication in other states.
A Magic Thread
As I write this, I’m about to leave for San Antonio for the 2010 Health and Productivity Forum, sponsored by the Integrated Benefits Institute and the National Business Coalition on Health. I’ll be participating in a panel discussion organized and led by Broadspire’s Gary Anderberg, one of the smartest people I know. Our panel will be addressing workers’ compensation medical care and costs and the effect health care reform may have on both. I sure hope that Gary has brought a few spools of Ariadne’s thread. We’re going to need some magic to guide us through this formidable labyrinth.

Health Wonk Review and other news briefs

Thursday, September 3rd, 2009

Jared Rhoads has posted a fresh Health Wonk Review at The Lucidicus Project. There are many interesting posts running the gamut: healthcare reform, home birth, hospice, hypertension and a variety of other topics that the health bloggers found noteworthy in the last two weeks.
Other news notes
Bad Manager of the Month Club – Scott Polston, an employee of Foster Farms Dairy in California, suddenly began getting a series bizarre phone calls and dozens of strangers coming to his home with unusual requests. The callers and visitors were responding to bogus ads that had been placed on craigslist, ads that were subsequently traced back to his supervisor, Michael Odell Simpson. At the time of this report, Simpson was no longer employed by the Dairy and was facing criminal complaints. Polston filed a worker’s compensation claim over stress.
Experts Detail Perils To Comp Insurers – “Unconventional threats to the workers’ compensation system, ranging from Medicare system red tape to recession problems to employers liability difficulties,” – these are all perils for employers and threats to the doctrine of exclusive remedy discussed by panelists at the recent at the Workers Compensation Educational Conference presented by the Florida Workers’ Compensation Institute in partnership with The National Underwriter Company.
Survey: Consumers Would Support TWD Ban – In light of our recent posts on texting while driving this week, we were interested to learn that a recent Harris Interactive survey revealed that 80% of Americans favor a ban on texting while driving, while two thirds favor a ban on cell phone calls, and more than half say they would support a ban on cell phone use altogether.
Labor DayAs the Industrial Revolution took hold of the nation, the average American in the late 1800s worked 12-hour days, seven days a week in order to make a basic living. Children were also working, as they provided cheap labor to employers and laws against child labor were not strongly enforced. With the long hours and terrible working conditions, American unions became more prominent and voiced their demands for a better way of life. On Tuesday September 5, 1882, 10,000 workers marched from city hall to Union Square in New York City, holding the first-ever Labor Day parade. – More at Labor Day History.
Workplace safety – We started the week with a texting-while-driving shock video that has been making the rounds on the Web. Today, we found a more uplifting video highlighting the importance of workplace safety from the Washington Department State Department of Labor & Industries:

Health Wonk Review: the party’s at our place this week

Thursday, August 9th, 2007

Kudos to some of our Health Wonk Review “usual suspects” who were included in Managed Care’s July story on health care blogs. Author Alan Adler, MD, who is the Medical Director, Independence Blue Cross, offers a brief intro into what blogs are and a sampling of various health care blogs. I think he did a great job explaining blogs. For example, how true is this:

If you’ve only heard of blogs from the consumer press, you might think they consist entirely of blather about pop culture and outrageous fulminations from the political far left and far right, but the fact is, there are many serious, well written blogs, and the major health care issues of the day are discussed on blogs — before, and more extensively, than they are or could ever be discussed in academic articles.

We’re glad to see some of the HWR crew cited. In the four years since we began blogging, we’ve really seen health care grow to be an exciting and thriving blog sector, and as Adler points out, there’s something for everyone.
OK, on to this week’s issue of Health Wonk Review. When I agreed to host in August, I thought I would have things easy, with just a few skinny posts here and there. Not so – lots of submissions rolled in, so settle down for a big fat issue and a good long read.
First up to bat, Dr. Roy M. Poses of Health Care Renewal blogs about another death in a gene therapy trial. In this case, the death occurred in an early phase trial of gene therapy for arthritis. The story includes troubling allegations of irregularities in the trial and odd connections between this trial and the infamous trial of gene therapy in the late 1990s, which also led to a patient death. Roy notes that despite the the story raising many intriguing questions and providing few answers, it has garnered little attention in the mainstream media.
Bob Laszewski of Health Care Policy and Marketplace Review asks why President Bush is suddenly so willing to veto spending bills. He notes that the President threatened to veto a highly popular bipartisan deal to reauthorize the State Children’s Health Insurance Plan (SCHIP), along with just about every other spending bill the Democrats have offered, including those with substantial Republican support. In the first six years he didn’t veto a single spending bill. What’s going on here? Bob has some ideas.
Jason Shafrin of Healthcare Economist discusses a study which appeared in the August issue of JAMA demonstrating that violence is a vicious cycle. The study included interviews with more than 2500 adults in northern Uganda to examine how exposure to war crimes affects views about peaceful negotiations.
What’s the secret to reforming health care? Dr. Brian Klepper from The Doctor Weighs In suggests that the answer lies in the private business sector, a group that must come together with common purpose to drive reform. And in assembling this coalition, he has a prescription for success: Don’t invite anyone from health care.
David Williams of Health Business Blog is apparently better natured than we are. He managed to get a laugh out of news reports that MA premiums were being held down by the health reform law since his own premium is going up 26.3%! I guess it’s laugh or cry. That was bad news for him to come home to. David has been on the road to see hospitals in Singapore, and kept a seven-part record of his travels at Singapore Medical Tourism Diary.
At HealthBlawg, David Harlow informs us that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is slouching towards pay for performance (P4P). He notes that while private-sector payors and CMS demonstration projects have begun P4P work in earnest, CMS is still in the pay-for-reporting phase of development, but is broadening the scope of this program.
Joe Paduda of Managed Care Matters tells us that when Medicare sneezes, the rest of the health care sector catches a cold. (Or some might even suggest pneumonia, Joe). He offers a quick guide to the primary impending Medicare changes.
Shock! Horror! Matthew Holt of The Health Care Blog disagrees with Uwe Reinhardt. Well, sort of. This week, he tackles the prickly subject of physician compensation.
Cheesy Insurance? What do swiss cheese, NFL teams, and insurance have in common? InsureBlog’s Bob Vineyard thinks that Wisconsin’s latest effort toward “universal health care” may get sacked before the first play, mainly because it’s full of holes.
Adam J. Fein of Drug Channels raises some heretical questions about the AMP war, including why we need the “Saving our Community Pharmacies Act of 2007” (H.R. 3140), which was proposed last week by Reps. Nancy Boyda (D-KS) and Jo Ann Emerson (R-MO). He cites economic data showing that the rhetoric about patient welfare has been overblown by the pharmacy lobby. He may also raise the hackles of the drug lobby in questioning whether the U.S. may actually have too many retail pharmacies.
According to Jay Norris at Colorado Health Insurance Insider, things aren’t looking too favorably for the “independence” of the independent commission established by newly elected Colorado Gov. Bill Ritter, which had the laudable goal of drawing up a plan for the future of health care in Colorado. It turns out that despite good intentions, the commission is now being run by bigwigs in the insurance industry.
Rita Schwab of MSSPNexus blogs about court decisions that signal a new era for hospital liability. Both Putnam General Hospital in WV and Silver Cross Hospital in IL have both been on the losing side of lawsuits involving negligent or sub-standard credentialing practices.Increasingly, malpractice attorneys are looking, not just at the physician’s skills, but also at the credentialing process in the hospital that granted the physician access to the facility.
In his post about why New York medical malpractice insurance jumped 14%, Eric Turkewitz of New York Personal Injury Law Blog suggests that “lousy government policy on the insurance end has caused a ‘crisis’ that affects health care.”
Michael F. Cannon of Cato@Liberty has a conversation with one of the WTC rescue workers who appeared in Sicko. If you’ve seen the film, you know that Michael Moore took 3 rescue workers to Cuba for health care that they couldn’t get here. Michael wrote an op-ed in a NY paper, and one of the workers posted a comment. Read the exchange.
Dmitriy Kruglyak of Trusted.MD looks at People Powered vs. Consumer Directed Healthcare and discusses what he sees as the very real differences between the two. The post offers his assessment of what is really wrong with Consumer-Directed Healthcare and how he thinks the private sector can fix things without turning everything over to the government.
Here at the Workers Comp Insider homestead, my colleague Jon Coppelman discusses the impending problems that are likely with the Homeland Security’s scheme to get tough on illegal immigration. Employers will be required to fire workers who have Social Security numbers that come up false.
The next issue of Health Wonk Review is just two weeks away. It will be hosted by Daniel Goldberg at Medical Humanities Blog. Keep up with the schedule and the archives at Health Wonk Review.